Back in July at the last City Council meeting, I presented the Mayor in a meeting prior to the General Meeting a timeline of events outlining specifically to the Edward H. Fickett, FAIA designed West Hollywood Park Library in relation to the Master Plan which calls for the City to redevelop the West Hollywood Park and Library facilities.  Hence, we are awaiting the doors to be open of the new Library knowing as soon as they do, the doors to the Fickett library will not only be closed, but demolished.
Now, I find it on the Agenda of the next Council meeting's Closed Session Item 3.
 This is the timeline given to the Mayor and City Attorney:
Hence, Mike Jenkins, the City Attorney was given the above timeline and then responded on Monday, August 8, 2011.
My Response to the Letter sent by City Attorney Michael Jenkins through Ms. Morgan:
August 8, 2011 via email
Ms. Morgan-
Thank you for passing along the response from Mr.  Jenkins in reference to the Fickett-designed Library in West Hollywood  Park.  As I spoke with Supervisor Yaroslavsky's office last week, the  County now has a hold of the Errata Sheet as well as me enclosing a copy  for your own records, since Mr. Jenkins did not acknowledge this in his  response.  This email is now being delivered to all concerned parties  within the City and County.
As the Land Transfer Agreement between the County of Los Angeles and  the City of West Hollywood was based on Resolution 03-2837 and the the  2004 Master Plan, it is clear the City is violation of the Land  Agreement on several counts, the County is now being notified of these  points as they create serious conflict within the Agreement between the  parties.  The Phasing of construction is getting creative and the  demolition of the Fickett Library is finally coming up for the FIRST  TIME through the city's Capital Project Phase 1B (which technically is  the Master Plan Phase IV, which you know requires the city to perform a  NEW EIR prior to starting Phase IV).  
It is being recommended to all County of Los Angeles Board of  Supervisors and West Hollywood Council to take a closer look at things  before major litigation will take place due to a bad deal between the  County and City, CEQA violations, and more mistrust by the community  with government officials trying to bully their way into a Master Plan  where the community is constantly being asked, "Where were you during  Public Comment?"  We were all at home thinking the Library was off the  table.  The question I have to all officials is, "Where were you?"  The  State agency CEQA isn't too pleased at the moment with West Hollywood  and their Master Plan.  There were some serious mis-representations  within some of the findings and have now been brought to their  attention.  
The MND's conclusion brought about through services provided by Myra  Frank and Associates as well as Tom Dodson & Associates who both  acknowledge the Library is not to be demolished as part of the City's  current plans, were then responded to through an Errata Sheet pulling  the Library out of the project ENTIRELY.  Perhaps you do some more  revisiting with folks as I have and then you may come to the conclusions  you base here on myth.  The Resolutions and documents all provide  support keeping the Fickett Library. Again, both agencies have been  contacted and confirmation has been received from them the Library was  never to be demolished.  Both parties seemed to express their equal  concern when told the City is going ahead in plans for demolition. 
You may want to prepare yourselves for the County Board of  Supervisors to start inquiring as to the legality of the Land Transfer  Agreement as the time tables are getting ready to shift the property  over to the City.  It seems here you are in violation of the agreement  as you are now changing what was given to them back in 2003 when you  started the Plan.  Any mention of destruction of the Library was taken  out of the project through the Errata Sheet, Mr. Jenkins does not bother  to mention in his response back to me.  Again, the Errata is left out  of the picture like it has throughout the City's bullying to the  community to have this Library destroyed for 5,000sf of grass.   Meanwhile an important Historic Monument is razed so the city can water  the grass?
The changing of the agreement and having the Library demolished  would also threaten your grant funding as what was submitted to the  State is not what you are acting off of.  Clearly, the City should try  to avoid future litigation as this is a simple issue to put at rest.   The City needs to keep the Fickett designed Library and re-use the  Library for other uses the city deems appropriate, such as a Reception  Hall, Tourist Center, Historical Landmark Center...
Further, the creative nature in the changing of the City's phasing  of the Master Plan is piquing my interest.  The only way around having  the old Library demolished was by incorporating it into the Capital  Project Plan through Phase 1B.   Plans to incorporate the demolition of  the Library as part of your Capital Plan Phase 1B is just a joke.  This  was only adopted back in May of 2011.  This would be THE first time the  Library was mentioned for demolition.  As the Master Plan laid out the  Phases early on, why was the Fickett Library not mentioned in any of the  language that was adopted by the city?  Maybe because it was never to  be torn down?  Here's how I see the Phases of the Master Plan working  through the Plans at hand.
- Phase      1  - Library and      Single Level Parking Structure.       "The  construction of the library and parking structure will be      completed  without disturbing other facilities including the existing       library."
- Phase      2  - Aquatic      Center and 2nd level of the Parking Structure.  "Upon  completion of the aquatic center, the      existing pool will be removed  for the next phase of park expansion."
- Phase      3 - Recreation      Center and 3rd level of the Parking Structure. 
 
- Phase      4 - Expanded      Park (Long Term      Proposals)       "Removal of existing facilities along San Vicente Blvd will allow  for      build out of the expanded park.       San Vicente Blvd's right  of way will be narrowed and shifted      easterly." (This is what the  City calls Capital Plan Phase 1B.)
Please review the Phases of the Master Plan and the Capital Project  one more time to read the language correctly.  If you need the  documents, I am more than happy to forward them to you.  I seem to have a  file cabinet full of the issue at hand.  ;-)
In the meantime, I hope you have a good afternoon.  I look forward  to seeing everyone Monday evening as I will present to the public and  Council the findings at hand.  
Too many times I have been asked  why now?  Why did I not do anything earlier?  Perhaps no one thought the  Library was in jeopardy as Resolution 03-2837 PULLED IT OUT OF THE  ENTIRE PROJECT.  Again, this was the basis of the final 2004 Master  Plan.  My question is, "Where have YOU been throughout this process?   Where have you been to direct the City to get back on course and drive  the ship properly?  Where was the closely guarded eye as this project  spans almost a decade making it more important to follow every step of  the way?
Truly yours,
Steve Ward
Los Angeles Modern Action Council ( LAMAC), Chair